Now what would this form look like? Well it starts with data. For the sake of starting an argument, I am going to say that from the years 2007 through 2009 the total national banana import fell by eight million bananas in the United States. Coinciding with this data is the fact that the hip fracture numbers in the US fell by two-thousand fractures. Now I have my data. At this point I start to analyze this data, applying a basic logical conclusion. As banana imports fell, so did hip fracture rates. I can now create a claim that banana peels are the leading cause of hip fractures in the US. My warrant is simple; as A fell so did B, thus A falling causes B to fall. This is simple logic. Now I must qualify this claim. I could simply state that the numbers are obvious and they do not lie; a sort of appeal to the unwavering ethical stature of numbers. I then rebut myself by saying that there are those who claim that hip fractures are caused by osteoporosis. This is an easy claim to refute because I can state that osteoporosis does not break the bones, it simply makes them break easier. I now have a complete argument. This claim may not be accurate but it is legitimate simply because of its form. I try to never include an argument in any of my writing that does not follow this guideline.
Toulmin, Stephen. The Uses of Argument. 2nd. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1958. Print.
but by allowing an argument do we thus create an opening to stengthen our argument? An argument is a two sided beast, in order to refute evidence from one side we must anticipate the reaction.
ReplyDeleteThat is why we add a rebuttal section to our argument. We strengthen our argument by showing its potential drawbacks, and then refuting them.
ReplyDeleteYou'll want to investigate the leading cause of broken hips. Bananas, or elderly people trying to get out of the bathtub? (Though I guess if this were a debate, this would be the job of your opposition...) Warrents must be examined further to validate the claims... Good examples, here, and nice discussion... :)
ReplyDeletealso -- nice breakdown of the Toulmin model, and creative example on how one might execute it... If you're interested in argument and logic, you may want to take a logic course (Philosophy 201.) Dr. Roark and Dr. Cortens are 2 profs that teach it, and I've heard great things about them and their courses.
ReplyDelete